I wish organizations that provide public lectures had the courage to venture into more controversial realms. Too often they provide public education, which is great, but stick to the vanilla topics that will inspire interest, not dissension. They claim “new ideas,” but insure that the ideas are either topics that will not weave any discord, or are presented in such a way to insure minimal disagreement or contention. What can we do to evolve these public learning and sharing events to include more critical questioning and debate? – processes that move us forward as individuals and communities.
One of my friends posted on Facebook recently: “The whole purpose of education is to turn mirrors into windows – Sydney J. Harris”
Would that were true! Frequently education is no more than mirrors. And distorted ones at that.
I am a huge fan of public lectures. It is a great way to remain socially engaged and to participate in continued education / lifelong learning. Some of the lectures I attend regularly are the science ones at Pasadena’s Caltech’s Beckman Auditorium, the Skeptics Society (hosted at Caltech) and Zocola Public Square. These lectures are sometimes fascinating, but often leave me with an unsatisfied sense. Because while they are informative they seldom raise the questions that need to be raised, seldom demand that the public think and debate and get involved with our path forward.
I think of Susan B. Anthony traveling our early nation in most uncomfortable ways, sans first class airplane seats or “comfort” inns. I think of her throwing out the heretical idea that women should have the vote – and equality. I think of the people who came out to support her and to learn the arguments they could later use in their own community debates on the topic. I think of the people who came out to jeer her; to prevent her ideas from getting any traction. Susan B. Anthony presented public debates on the topic she was most passionate about for the duration of her life. And died eleven years before women did get the vote. Her lectures were controversial. Her lectures served to stir the public and move them forward.
Yes, the Skeptics Society does have their ‘God v. Science’ lecture / debate each year. But that topic is so tired. What if we were to approach all lectures as debates?
Recently I attended a Zocola lecture at the Petersen Auto Museum in Los Angeles about the future of space exploration. Talk about a topic ripe for debate, for public input and deliberation. But, for the most part, we simply heard life-story tidbits, and traditional “what we learned in space that we are now using on earth” tales from three panelists as they were questioned by a moderator who had given each of their bios a cursory study. Continue reading The Future of Space Exploration: Where’s the Public Discourse and Debate?